Compare

Product Positioning

	Lemonce	Selenium	QTP
Works on all browsers	Yes (v2.1)	Yes	No
Works on Mac OS / Windows / Linux	Yes	Yes	No
Test every web applications	Yes	Yes	Yes
Tool integration	High	Low	High
Works on Chromium browser core & execution environment	Yes	No	No
Webdriver required as executive agent	No	Yes	No
Needs updates when browsers’ versions update	No	Yes	Yes

Programming Language

	Lemonce	Selenium	QTP
Proprietary language for web UI testing	Yes	No	No
Ease of programming language learning	Easy	Average	Average
Branches and cycle statements	Yes	Yes	Yes

Record Test Case

	Lemonce	Selenium	QTP
Select element by content	Sizzle	No	No
Multiple ways to select elements	Yes	Yes	No
Element selection methods	CSS/Sizzle/Xpath	CSS/Xpath	Xpath
Default element selector	CssPath	Xpath	Xpath
Select element in Iframe	Yes	No	No
Auto-generate comments when recording	Yes	No	No
Web action recording accuracy	High	Medium	High
Intelligent waiting for web actions & page loading	Yes	No	No

Edit Test Case

	Lemonce	Selenium	QTP
Readability of codes generated by recorder	High	Low	Low
Easy to modify auto-generated codes	Yes	No	No
Reusable element bank	Yes	No	Yes
Reusable sub-process library	Yes	No	Yes
Import existing test cases to create new tests	Yes	No	Yes
Reusability of code modules	High	Medium	High

Run Test Case

	Lemonce	Selenium	QTP
Playback accuracy	High	Medium	High
Complete event dispatch	Yes	No	Yes
Playback speed	Fast	Fast	Slow
Inbuilt detailed logs and reports	Yes	Need Plug-in	Yes
Report readability	Easy	Hard	Easy
Error screenshot	Yes	Need Plug-in	Yes

Others

	Lemonce	Selenium	QTP
Cost of building a test team	Low	High	Low
Technical support	Yes	No	Yes